Yunus & ANR v. The State & ANR

$~8 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CRL.M.C. 3894/2017 YUNUS & ANR ..... Petitioners Through Mr. S.K. Srivastava, Adv.

versus THE STATE & ANR ..... Respondents Through Mr. G.M. Farooqui, APP with SI Sunil Kumar, P.S. Govind Puri for respondent no. 1 Mr.

Kamal Pundir, Adv.

with respondent no. 2 in person

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK

O R D E R

% 15.11.2017 Respondent no.2 Shaheen is present in Court along with her counsel and has been identified by SI Sunil Kumar of police station Govind Puri. Respondent no. 2 says that she has settled the matter with petitioner no. 1 before the Counselling Cell, Family Courts, South-East District, Saket Court, New Delhi dated 12th January, 2017 of her own free will, voluntarily and without any undue force, pressure or coercion. Petitioner no. 1 has paid `1,00,000/- to the respondent no. 2 towards the balance settled amount by way of a demand draft, photocopy whereof has been placed on record.

Respondent no. 2 says that with this payment she has received the entire settled amount and is not willing to pursue the FIR any further against the petitioner no. 1 and his relative, that is, petitioner no. 2 and the same may be quashed.

Keeping in mind the settlement arrived at between the petitioners and respondent no. 2, in the interest of justice, FIR No.509/2012 under Sections 498-A/406/34 IPC registered at Police Station Govind Puri and the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed. Petition is disposed of in the above terms. Dasti. A.K. PATHAK, J.

NOVEMBER 15, 2017 r.bararia