Tarun Tomar v. Deepali Dhoudiyal

$~30-31 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.L.P. 585/2017 TARUN TOMAR ..... Petitioner Represented by:

None versus DEEPALI DHOUDIYAL ..... Respondent Represented by:

Respondent in person.

+ CRL.L.P. 597/2017 TARUN TOMAR ..... Petitioner Represented by:

None versus DEEPALI DHOUNDIYAL ..... Respondent Represented by:

Respondent in person.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA

O R D E R

% 08.02.2018 Present none for the petitioner. Respondent in person. Respondent states that despite acquittal respondent has settled the matter with the petitioner and in lieu of all the claims of the petitioner in respect of the three cheques allegedly dishonoured, respondent has paid a sum of ₹1,20,000/- as per the copy of the MOU handed-over. Copy of the MOU has been taken on record on both the files. Petitions are dismissed for non-prosecution.

MUKTA GUPTA, J.

FEBRUARY 08, 2018 /'ga'