Dinesh Awasthi v. Mahindra Sub Labh Services Ltd & Others

$~38 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 3230/2015 and I.A. No. 22654/2015 DINESH AWASTHI ..... Plaintiff Through:

Ms. Deepti Sugathan, Advocate versus MAHINDRA SUB LABH SERVICES LTD & OTHERS ..... Defendant Through:

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI

O R D E R

% 12.01.2016 On the last date, summons/notice were issued to the defendant, however, process fee filed by the plaintiff is lying under objections. In view of the notification No.2718/DHC/Orgl. dated 25.11.2015, issued under Section 4 of the Delhi High Court (Amendment) Act, 2015 (Act 23 of 2015), at the request of the counsels for the parties, the present suit is transferred to the Court of the District Judge, Patiala House Courts, Delhi for further proceedings before the competent court on 01.04.2016. VIPIN SANGHI, J JANUARY 12, 2016 sl

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 3001/2015 MR. ASHOK SHAH ..... Plaintiff Through:

Ms.Sumedha Dua, Advocate with Mr.

Prashant Shah, Advocate versus MS. MANITA VERMA ..... Defendant Through:

Mr. Atin Shankar Rastogi, Advocate with Mr.

Gaurav Chaudhary, Advocate

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI

O R D E R

% 12.01.2016 The written statement is on record. It is not in dispute that the delay is of 9 days. Considering the fact that the delay is only 9 days and written statement has been filed within 120 days of the summons being served, the delay is condoned and the written statement is taken on record. Replication, if any, be filed within four weeks. The parties may file their respective documents within two weeks. Admission/denial of documents on affidavit be conducted within four weeks by the parties.

I.A. No. 20875/2015 In view of the reply filed by the defendant, the application is disposed of by directing that the defendant shall maintain status-quo with regard to the title and possession of the suit property till the disposal of the suit. List on 02.03.2016.

VIPIN SANGHI, J JANUARY 12, 2016 sr/sl