Rajesh Kohli v. Union Of India And ANR.

/ $-14 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(C) 8607/2017 SANGEETA KOHLI Petitioner Through; Mr Ashok Mathur, Advocate, versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.

Respondents Through: Mr Vikas Mahajan, CGSC with Mr S.S. Rai, Advocates.

AND + / W.P.(C) 8624/2017 RAJESH KOHLI Petitioner Through: Mr Ashok Mathur, Advocate, versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.

Respondents Through:

Mr Vikas Mahajan, CGSC with Mr S.S. Rai, Advocates.

CORAM;

HON'BLE MR.

JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU

ORDER

% 09.10.2017 The petitioners have filed the present petitions, inter alia, impugning the action of respondents in withholding the renewal of their registrations. This, it is contended, amounts to blacklisting. It is also pointed out that no show cause notice for withholding of any registration has been issued. The learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that the renewal of registration shall not be withheld for a period of more than four weeks from today. In the meanwhile, if the respondents seek to deny renewal of registration, respondents shall issue a show cause notice and give full opportunity to the petitioners to represent their case and pass a final order within the period of four weeks.

Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing.

In view of the above, no further orders are required to be passed in this petition except to direct that in the event the show cause notice is not issued within a period of two weeks from today, the respondents will ensure that the registration in favour of the petitioners is renewed immediately thereafter;

Order dasti.

VIBHU BAKHRU, J OCTOBER 09, 2017 RK