Dinesh Tomar & ANR v. Central Board Of Secondery Education & ORS

$~57 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LPA 648/2017, C.M. APPL.36084/2017 DINESH TOMAR & ANR ..... Appellants Through : Sh. Mukesh. M. Goel, Advocate.

versus CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDERY EDUCATION & ORS ..... Respondents Through : Sh. Amit Bansal and Ms. Seema Dolo, Advocates, for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2.

Sh.Anuj Aggarwal, ASC with Ms. Deboshree Mukherjee, Advocate, for Respondent Nos. 3 and 4.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR

O R D E R

% 09.10.2017 This is a worthless appeal. After some hearing, learned counsel for the appellants seeks liberty to withdraw the appeal and states that the other remedies may be kept open. It is also requested that the observations made in the course of the impugned order should not be treated as conclusive. Liberty granted.

The Court also clarifies that the observations of the learned Single Judge are not to be treated as conclusive in case the appellants avail of other remedies.

The appeal is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn along with the pending application.

S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J SUNIL GAUR, J OCTOBER 09, 2017/ajk