Preeti Sundariyal v. Commissioner Of Police & ORS

$~29 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 8699/2017 PREETI SUNDARIYAL ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. Kamlesh Kumar Mishra, Adv.

versus COMMISSIONER OF POLICE & ORS ..... Respondent Through:

Mr. Sanjoy Ghose, ASC with Ms. Urvi Mohan, Adv. for R-2 & 4 Mr. Parvinder Chauhan, Adv. with Mr. Nitin Jain, Adv. for DUSIB SI Manish, PS Palam Village

CORAM:

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO

O R D E R

% 29.08.2018 Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the prayer made in this public interest litigation, we are of the considered view that the general issues raised in this writ petition cannot be looked into by us in exercise of our extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. However, if the petitioner feels that while discharging her professional duties with regard to the incident narrated in the pleadings, if the petitioner has been dealt with in a manner not permissible in law, liberty is given to the petitioner to challenge the same in accordance with

law before an appropriate forum.

With the aforesaid observation, the petition is disposed of. CHIEF JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO, J AUGUST 29, 2018/ak