Naisha Industreis v. Commissioner Of Value Added Tax & ANR.

$~16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 8721/2017 NAISHA INDUSTREIS ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. Mayank Gupta, Advocate versus COMMISSIONER OF VALUE ADDED TAX & ANR.. Respondents Through:

Mr. Gursharan Singh, Advocate

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR

O R D E R

% 23.01.2018 Learned counsel for the respondent states that a refund order has been passed. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that refund order has been partly granted and the full amount of refund has not been paid. It is open to the petitioner to challenge the order passed in accordance with law.

With the aforesaid observations and without commenting on merits, the writ petition is disposed of, without any order as to costs. SANJIV KHANNA, J CHANDER SHEKHAR, J JANUARY 23, 2018 tp