Raj Kumar v. State Of NCT Of Delhi

$~36 to 42 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 922/2017 RAJ KUMAR ..... Appellant Presence not given.

STATE OF NCT OF DELHI + CRL.A. 950/2017 SATISH ..... Appellant Mr. Himanshu Buttan, Advocate.

STATE + CRL.A. 976/2017 ISLAM ..... Appellant Mr. Rahul Sharma, Advocate.

STATE NCT OF DELHI + CRL.A. 980/2017 MOHD ZAIKI ..... Appellant

Mr. Rahul Sharma, Advocate.

STATE NCT OF DELHI + CRL.A. 1109/2017 SUNIL KUMAR ..... Appellant Mr. Avinash, Advocate for Mr.

Aditya Vikram, DHCLSC.

STATE + CRL.A. 1183/2017 RAJENDER ..... Appellant Mr. S.S. Handa and Mr. Shiva Handa, Advocates.

THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI + CRL.A. 104/2018 PARVEEN GOEL ..... Appellant Mr. K. Singhal, Advocate.

THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA

O R D E R

% 10.01.2019 CRL.A. 922/2017 and Crl.M.B. No. 1729/2017, Crl. M.A. No. 10917/2018 CRL.A. 950/2017 and Crl.M.B. No. 1787/2017 CRL.A. 976/2017 and Crl.M.B. No. 1873/2017 CRL.A. 980/2017 and Crl.M.B. No. 1877/2017 CRL.A. 1109/2017 and Crl.M.B. No. 2149/2017 CRL.A. 1183/2017 and Crl.M.B. No. 2268/2017 Crl.M.B. No. 176/2018 in CRL.A. 104/2018 Further arguments heard on behalf of appellant, Praveen Goel. Arguments have been concluded on behalf of learned counsels for the appellants who seek time to file written submissions. The same be filed within one week, copy whereof be handed over to learned APP for the State who seeks time to file response to the written submissions. List on 14th February, 2019 for arguments of the State. MUKTA GUPTA, J.

JANUARY 10, 2019 'yo'