Harmohinder Singh v. Om Prakash Singh
$~19 *
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ RC.REV. 577/2015 HARMOHINDER SINGH ..... Petitioner Through:
None.
versus OM PRAKASH SINGH ..... Respondent Through:
Mr. Vikrant Arora, Advocate.
CORAM:
SH. V.K. KOCHHAR, REGISTRAR (ORIGINAL)
O R D E R
% 27.01.2016 The affidavit of undertaking dated 03.12.2015 on behalf of petitioner has been filed.
The said undertaking filed on behalf of petitioner is not complete as the undertaking to vacate the premises on or before 30.11.2017 has not been mentioned therein. Further, the affidavit of acceptance of undertaking on behalf of Respondent has also not been filed.
Counsel appearing for the Respondent states that the same was not filed as the petitioner has not paid the first instalment of arrears of rent which was to be paid on 01.01.2016 and has also not supplied the copy of the undertaking which has been filed on behalf of petitioner. In view of the aforesaid position, list the abovesaid matter before the Hon'ble Court on 9th March 2016, for further directions. V.K. KOCHHAR REGISTRAR (ORIGINAL) JANUARY 27, 2016/p