Gulab Bai & ORS v. South Delhi Municipal Corporation & ANR
$~20, 21, 22 & 23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 9259/2015 and Review Petition No. 429/2016 GULAB BAI & ORS ..... Petitioners Through Mr.
Ramesh Kumar Mishra, Advocate versus SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ANR ..... Respondent Through Mr. Ajjay Aroraa, Mr. Kapil Dutta and Mr. D. K. Puchnanada, Advocates for SDMC Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, Addl. Standing Counsel for GNCTD + W.P.(C) 723/2016 and Review Petition No. 428/2016 BHAGWAN DAS ..... Petitioner Through Mr.
Ramesh Kumar Mishra, Advocate versus SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ANR ..... Respondent Through Mr. Ajjay Aroraa, Mr. Kapil Dutta and Mr. D. K. Puchnanada, Advocates for SDMC Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, Addl. Standing Counsel for GNCTD + W.P.(C) 751/2016 and Review Petition No. 426/2016
SAMPATI DEVI ..... Petitioner Through Mr.
Ramesh Kumar Mishra, Advocate versus SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ANR ..... Respondents Through Mr. Ajjay Aroraa, Mr. Kapil Dutta and Mr. D. K. Puchnanada, Advocates for SDMC Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, Addl. Standing Counsel for GNCTD + W.P.(C) 753/2016 and Review Petition No. 427/2016 KAMLA ..... Petitioner Through Mr.
Ramesh Kumar Mishra, Advocate versus SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ANR ..... Respondents Through Mr. Ajjay Aroraa, Mr. Kapil Dutta and Mr. D. K. Puchnanada, Advocates for SDMC Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, Addl. Standing Counsel for GNCTD
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR
O R D E R
% 23.09.2016
This petition seeking review of order dated 12.07.2016 is premised on the factual submission that TVC of respondent no.1 is not functional as yet; the order dated 12.07.2016 had wrongly noted that TVC of SDMC is functional. That part of the order is set aside. Application disposed of.
INDERMEET KAUR, J SEPTEMBER 23, 2016 gb