Jagvir Singh v. State Of NCT Of Delhi

X * m THE HIGH COTOT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + bail APPLN. 2781/2018 JAGVIR SINGH Represented by: , .

Petitioner Mr.Sanjeev Anand, Mr.Murari Kumar, Mi-.Varun K.Bala and Mr.Ankit Singh, Advocates versus STATE OF NOT OF DELHI Respondent Ms.Meenakshi Chauhan, APP for the State Represented by:

rBAIL APPLN. 2783/2018 + SURENDER SINGH Petitioner Mr.Sanjeev Anand, Mr.Murari Kumar, Mr.Varun K.Bala and Mr.Ankit Singh, Advocates Represented by:

versus STATE OF NOT OF DELHI Represented by:

Respondent Ms.Meenakshi Chauhan, APP for the State

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA %

ORDER

20.12.2018 1.

By these petitions, petitioners seek bail in case FIR No.342/2018 under Sections 406/420/34 IPG registered at PS Malviya Nagar. The abovenoted FIR was registered on the complaint of one T.C.Badan who BAIL APPLN. 2781/2018 & conn.matter page lof2 Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing.

stated that he was the CEO of Made Easy Pvt. Ltd. which is a company running institutes all over India for coaching classes for students for preparation of UPSC examination i.e. IAS and lES. In this regards they publish various books and they had placed order of such books to M/s.Trident Printing Solution who gave the sub-contract to Vinayak Offset Printing Press for printing of the books. The petitioners are the owners of Vinayak Offset Printing Press and the allegations against the petitioners are that they printed extra number of books of the publication of Made Easy Pvt. Ltd. and sold them in the market. During the course of investigation, 277 such books have been recovered. Petitioners are in custody since 26'^ October, 2018 and the investigation if any would have been completed by now.

2.

Considering the nature of allegations and that the petitioners have already been in custody from nearly two months and have been subjected to custodial interrogation, this Court deems it fit to grant bail to the petitioners. It is, therefore, directed that the petitioners be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond in the sum of ?25,000/- each with two surety bonds each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court/CMM®uty Magistrate fiirther subject to the condition that in case of nh.nge of address they will intimate the same to the learned Trial Court. 3.

Petitions are disposed of.

4.

Order dasti.

MUKTA GUPTA, J.

DECEMBER 20, 2018 mamta BAIL APPLN. 2781/2018 & conn.matter ^ ^