Vijay Malik & ANR v. State Of NCT Of Delhi & ANR

$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 2985/2017 & Crl.M.A. 17366/2017 VIJAY MALIK & ANR ..... Petitioner Represented by:

Mr. Madhukar Sharma, proxy Adv.

versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ..... Respondent Represented by:

Ms. Kamna Vohra, ASC with SI Ranvir Singh PS Roop Nagar.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA

O R D E R

% 27.02.2019 Learned proxy counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petition and application. Since his vakalatnama is not on record, petition cannot be permitted to be withdrawn.

A perusal of the previous order reveals that till date learned arguing counsel has not appeared and has not argued the matter for admission and no notice in the petition has been issued.

Petition and application are dismissed for non-prosecution. MUKTA GUPTA, J.

FEBRUARY 27, 2019 'ga'