Kamal v. State

J $-8 & , *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ BAIL APPLN. 1437/2017 BOBBY '

Petitioner ) Through : Mr.Surinder Kumar with Ms.Jyotsana Gupta and Mr.Arun ShaiTna, Advocates.

versus STATE, .

..... Respondent Through : Mr.Amit Chadha, APP.

SI Naveen, PS Aman Vihar.

+ BAIL APPLN.

2044/2017 KAMAL .

.....Petitioner Through : Mr.Surinder Kumar with Ms.Jyotsana Gupta and Mr.Arun Sharma, Advocates.

versus STATE Respondent Through : Mr.Amit Chadha, APP.

I SI Naveen, PS Aman Vihar.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR.

JUSTICE S.P.GARG Bail Appl.1437/17 & 2044/17 Page I of2 ' , By:AMULYA

'

> /

ORDER

% 09.01.2018

(1) The petitioners seek anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in case FIR No.805/17 under Sections 452/308/506/34 IPG registered at Police Station Aman Vihar. Status report is on record.

(2) I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have examined the file. The petitioners Boby and Kamal were granted interim protection and were directed to join the investigation as and when" required by orders dated 27.07.2017 and 13.10.2017 respectively. Undisputedly, the petitioners have since joined the investigation. The victim was discharged from the hospital and the injuries suffered by him are stated to be 'simple' in nature.

(3) Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioners are admitted to anticipatory bail and in the event of their aiTcst, they be released on bail on his furnishing personal bond in the sum of ?40,000/- each with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the SHO/Investigating Officer with the condition that they shall join the investigation as and when required.

(4) The bail applications stand disposed of.

I 5^^ Xp.garg, j.

JANUARY 09, 2018/sa Bail Appl. 1437/17 & 2044/17