Rahul Chaudhary v. State

$~4 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ BAIL APPLN. 2062/2017 RAHUL CHAUDHARY ..... Petitioner Through :

Mr.R.K.Tarun, Advocate with Mr.Sumit Kumar, Advocates.

versus STATE ..... Respondent Through :

Mr.Tarang Srivastava, APP.

SI Pardeep Kumar, PS Kapashera.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG

O R D E R

% 09.02.2018 1.

The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in case FIR No.399/2017 registered under Sections 354/451/323/506/509/34 IPC at PS Kapashera. Status report is on record.

2.

I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have examined the file. By an order dated 16.10.2017, the petitioner was granted interim bail and was directed to join the investigation as and when required.

Undisputedly, the petitioner has joined the investigation since then. The parties are acquainted with each other. Order dated 27.09.2017 reflects that petitioner's sister has filed a criminal case No. 93/2015 PS Mandavli under Sections 406/498A/34

IPC against her husband and in-laws.

The matter is likely to be compromised between the parties as per order of the Principal Judge, Family Courts, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi.

3.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, interim bail granted vide order dated 16.10.2017 is confirmed on the same terms and conditions.

4.

The bail application stands disposed of.

S.P.GARG, J.

FEBRUARY 09, 2018 / tr