Deepak Kaushik v. Vinod Kaushik & ORS

$~9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO 540/2018 & CM APPLs. 49280/2018, 61969/2025 DEEPAK KAUSHIK .....Appellant Through:

None.

Versus

VINOD KAUSHIK & ORS .....Respondents Through:

Mr. Peeyoosh Kalra, Advocate for respondent No.1 Mr. A. Abhiraj Ray and Mr. Aamir Abbas N., Advocates for respondent Nos. 2(c), 2(d) and 2(e)

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE CHANDRASEKHARAN SUDHA

O R D E R

% 19.12.2025

1. The respondents are represented. However, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant.

2. It is submitted by learned counsel for the respondents that the appeal has become infructuous as the suit has been disposed of by the trial court vide order dated 29.10.2025, as per which the application under Order 7 Rule 11(a) CPC was allowed and the plaint was rejected.

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/12/2025 at 12:32:04

3. In view of the above, the appeal is disposed of as rendered infructuous alongwith pending application(s), if any. CHANDRASEKHARAN SUDHA, J DECEMBER 19, 2025 p'ma The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/12/2025 at 12:32:04