Veneet Kataria & ORS. v. State & ORS.
$~25 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 5987/2018 & CRL.M.A. 48185/2018 VENEET KATARIA & ORS.
.... Petitioners Through:
Mr. Prabhjit Jauhar, Ms.
Rosemary Raju, Ms. Aishwarya and Ms. Upasana Goel, Advs.
versus STATE & ORS.
.... Respondents Through:
Mr. Ashish Dutta, APP Mr. Dhruv Surana, Mr. Ashish Choudhury and Ms. Rekha Kataria, Advs. for R-2 with R-2 in person
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR
O R D E R
% 28.11.2018 CRL.M.A. 48185/2018 (for exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of.
CRL.M.C. 5987/2018 1.
The petitioners have filed the present petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for quashing of FIR No.1578/2015 under Sections 498-A/406/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC), registered with Police Station Shalimar Bagh, New Delhi and the proceedings emanating therefrom.
2.
The petitioners and respondent No.2 as well as the learned counsels for the parties submitted that the parties have entered into a
settlement agreement dated 25.8.2018 in pursuance whereof, their marriage has been dissolved vide decree of divorce dated 18.9.2018 pronounced by Judge Family Courts (West District), Tis Hazari Courts, New Delhi.
3.
The Investigating Officer ('IO'), who is present in Court, has identified the petitioners as well as respondent No.2 and has also verified the settlement arrived at between the parties. 4.
The petitioners and the respondent No.2, present in the Court, stated that the settlement was arrived at between the parties on their own free will, without any force, pressure or coercion, in terms whereof payment of Rs.1,00,02,500/- has already been made and the petitioners have to pay the balance amount of Rs. 54,67,500/- to the respondent No.2. Respondent No.2 submitted that in case the petitioners make the payment of Rs.54,67,500/- in terms of the settlement arrived at between the parties, she has no objection in case the FIR is quashed and the petition is allowed. 5.
The petitioners have handed over five demand drafts (Demand Draft No.021784 dated 29.9.2018 for an amount of Rs.15,00,000/-, Demand Draft No.021785 dated 29.9.2018 for an amount of Rs.10,00,000/-, Demand Draft No.021802 dated 8.10.2018 for an amount of Rs.4,67,500/-, Demand Draft No.021821 dated 15.10.2018 for an amount of Rs.10,00,000/-, and Demand Draft No.021875 dated 9.11.2018 for an amount of Rs.15,00,000/-, total amounting to Rs.54,67,500/-) to the respondent No.2 in Court. The parties submitted that in view of the payment of the balance amount as well as in the
interest of justice, the aforesaid petition may be allowed. 6.
In view of the aforesaid circumstances, the settlement arrived at between the parties, this Court is of the view that no fruitful purpose would be served in keeping the parties entangled in the criminal proceedings. Accordingly, in the interest of justice, FIR No.1578/2015 under Sections 498-A/406/34 IPC, registered at Police Station Shalimar Bagh, New Delhi and all the consequential proceedings arising out of the FIR are quashed.
7.
Petition is disposed of in above terms.
CHANDER SHEKHAR, J NOVEMBER 28, 2018/rk