Pushpender v. State ( NCT ) Of Delhi & ORS

$~8 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(CRL) 2111/2015 PUSHPENDER ..... Petitioner Through :

Mr.Satender K.Mishra, Advocate with Mr.Ashutosh K.Singh, Advocate.

versus STATE ( NCT ) OF DELHI & ORS ..... Respondents Through :

Ms.Richa Kapoor, ASC with Mr.Ashish Negi & Mr.Rohit Kaul, Advocates.

SI Om Parkash.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG

O R D E R

% 14.01.2016 1.

During the course of arguments, it was informed that the petitioner has already undergone the punishment awarded to him by the Superintendent Jail vide order dated 30.03.2015. The petitioner was punished for spreading remours about the transfer of the Superintendent Jail and his mulakaat for a period of a week was stopped on this score.

2.

Learned Addl. Standing Counsel for the respondent / State fairly admitted that it was not a case to award punishment. Since the petitioner has already undergone the punishment awarded, only W.P.(CRL) 2111/2015

prayer of the petitioner at this juncture is that this punishment should have no impact on the parole / furlough applications to be filed by the petitioner. To this, learned Addl. Standing Counsel has no objection. 3.

Accordingly, punishment given to the petitioner vide order dated 30.03.2015 shall have no impact on furlough / parole applications to be moved by the petitioner. It won't have any bearing on any other relief to be sought by the petitioner as per law. 4.

In view of it, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the present writ petition. The writ petition is disposed of with the observations above.

5.

Copy of the order be sent to the Superintendent Jail for compliance.

S.P.GARG, J JANUARY 14, 2016 / tr W.P.(CRL) 2111/2015