Rinku Yadav v. Union Of India And ANR.

$~43.

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(C) 9570/2017 and CM APPL. 38953-54/2017 RINKU YADAV ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Pallav Kumar, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.

..... Respondents Through: Mr. Vijay Joshi, Senior Penal Counsel with Mr. Sushil Kumar Pandey, Advocate and Mr. Vinod Kumar, Dy. Commandant

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI

O R D E R

% 30.10.2017 1.

Counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the present petition while reserving the right of the petitioner to file a fresh petition after he receives a reply to the RTI application submitted to the respondent No.2/BSF.

2.

Leave, as prayed for, is granted. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn alongwith the pending applications. HIMA KOHLI, J REKHA PALLI, J OCTOBER 30, 2017 rkb