Deepender Kumar @ Chotu v. State

$~34 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(CRL) 3066/2017 DEEPENDER KUMAR @ CHOTU ..... Petitioner Through :

Mr.Nitish Chaudhary, proxy counsel.

versus STATE ..... Respondent Through :

Mr.Jamal Akhtar, proxy counsel with ASI Krishan Kumar.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG

O R D E R

% 16.01.2018 1.

The instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed on behalf of the petitioner for seeking parole for a period of three months. Status report is on record.

2.

Nominal Roll dated 13.10.2017 reveals that the petitioner was convicted under Section 21(C) NDPS Act and was sentenced to undergo RI for ten years with fine ` 1 lac. Crl.A. 496/2012 was disposed of by this Court on 07.07.2014. Nominal Roll further reveals that the petitioner has already undergone seven years, eight months and one day incarceration. It further reveals that he is not involved in any other criminal case and is not a previous convict. His overall jail conduct is satisfactory. Earlier he was granted parole / furlough on various occasions and there are no allegations of its misuse.

3.

In the interest of justice and for the reasons mentioned in the writ petition, the petitioner is granted three weeks parole from the date of his release, on his furnishing personal bond in the sum of `40,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court/CMM/Duty Magistrate. After completion of parole period, the petitioner shall surrender before the Jail Superintendent. 4.

Writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms. S.P.GARG, J JANUARY 16, 2018 / tr