Ravi Chauhan v. The State (Govt. Of NCT Of Delhi )

$~24 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 2166/2017 & Crl.M.A. No. 17599/2017 RAVI CHAUHAN ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Vineet Chadha, Adv.

versus THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI ) ..... Respondent Through Mr. Panna Lal Sharma, APP for the State SI Davendar Malik, PS Ranjit Nagar Complainants in person

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA

O R D E R

% 13.12.2017 Crl.M.A. No. 17599/2017 Allowed subject to all just exceptions.

Bail Application No. 2166/2017 Status report is on the record.

Submissions made on behalf of the either side. It has been submitted on behalf of the State that the applicant has joined the investigation after 29.11.2017. On behalf of the applicant it has been contended that he has been falsely implicated in the instant case and that the allegation in relation to outraging the modesty of the complainant No.2 i.e. the mother of the complainant No.1 has been subsequently added. It has been submitted by the complainant, however, that the said allegation had been submitted through a complaint on the night of the date of the incident itself. In the FIR also the allegation in relation to the alleged commission of outraging the modesty of the complainant No.2 i.e. the mother of the complainant No.1, prima facie related to the other co-accused persons and not to the

accused No.4.

The complainant No.1 seeks to show the photographs to indicate that he was injured in relation to which MLC was made at the Lady Harding Medical College & Smt. Sucheta Kriplani Hospital New Delhi to the effect that the nature of injuries was opined to be simple caused with the blunt object. It has also been brought forth by the State that no MLC of the complainant No.2 i.e. the mother of the complainant No.1 was recorded. It has been further stated on behalf of the State that there are no previous adverse antecedents against the applicant. Taking the totality of the circumstances of the case into account, without adverting into the merits and demerits of the case, in the event of arrest, the applicant is allowed to be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.

50,000/- with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial court subject to the condition that the applicant shall not contact with the complainants and their family and shall not intimidate the witnesses, shall not tamper with the evidence, shall not leave the country and shall not commit any offence whatsoever. In the event of any other FIR or kalandara being registered against the applicant, the same be brought to the notice of the Court forthwith by the State.

The application stands disposed of.

Copy of the order be given Dasti, as prayed.

ANU MALHOTRA, J DECEMBER 13, 2017/aj