Reliance Communiction Limited & ANR. v. Bharti Infratel Limited

$~34 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ARB. A. (COMM.) 47/2017 RELIANCE COMMUNICTION LIMITED & ANR...... Petitioners Through :

Mr.Dayan Krishnan, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Chaitanya Safaya, Ms.Shruti Garg and Mr.Sanjeevi Seshadri, Advs.

versus BHARTI INFRATEL LIMITED ..... Respondent Through :

Mr.Karan S.Chandhiok, Mr.Vikram Sobti and Mr.Mehul Parti, Advs.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA

O R D E R

% 24.01.2018 IA No.1166/2018 This application is for corrections in the order dated 15.1.2018, which are as follows:

(a) in para 2(g) and para 8 wherein the date of 01.10.2017 and 01.07.2017 respectively has been mentioned instead of 01.06.2017; (b) in para 13 at page No.9 in lines No.5 & 9 from top wherein respondents has been mentioned instead of petitioners/appellants; (c) in para 20 at page No.11 in line No.3 & 9 from top wherein respondents has been mentioned instead of petitioners/appellants; (d) in para 23 at page No.14 in line No.3 & 5 from top wherein respondents has been mentioned instead of petitioners/appellants; (e) in para 26 at page No.16 in line No.6 from top wherein respondents has been mentioned instead of petitioners/appellants; and (f) in OMP(ENF) (COMM.) No.143/2017 wherein the word 'Reliance

Communication Ltd.' has been mentioned instead of 'judgment debtors No.1 and 2'.

The above corrections are allowed and hence the judgment dated 15.01.2018 be read with said corrections. The application stands disposed of.

Order dasti.

YOGESH KHANNA, J JANUARY 24, 2018 VLD