Himani Malhotra v. Indraprastha College For Women

$~24 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 9771/2017 HIMANI MALHOTRA ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr.G.Tushar Rao, Advocate and Mr.Mayank Sharma, Advocate versus INDRAPRASTHA COLLEGE FOR WOMEN ..... Respondent Through:

Mr.Rajesh Gogna (CGSC), Mr.Akhilesh Kumar and Ms.Vipra Bhardwaj, Advocates for R-1

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR

O R D E R

% 01.12.2017 CM No.43836/2017 Learned counsel for petitioner confines this application to seek direction to respondent to produce the original prospectuses from the year 2004 till the year 2010.

Upon notice, learned counsel submits that the original prospectuses for the aforesaid period in question would be produced before the Inquiry Officer within 3 days with copy to opposite side. Taking on record the aforesaid undertaking on behalf of the respondent, the application is disposed of.

Dasti.

SUNIL GAUR, J.

DECEMBER 01, 2017/mamta