Vinod @ Sillu v. The State NCT Of Delhi

$~6 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ BAIL APPLN. 2183/2017 VINOD @ SILLU ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Mahesh Kumar Patel, Adv.

versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP with SI Vinay Pal, Special Cell

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK

O R D E R

% 19.12.2017 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that initially FIR was registered under Sections 365/302/34 IPC at Police Station Mundka. Subsequently, charge-sheet was filed.

Charges have been framed under Section 25 of the Arms Act as well as Section 120-B IPC read with Section 302 IPC. No dead body has been recovered. Only on the basis of some intercepted mobile conversation, prosecution alleges that petitioner and her co-accused Harvinder @ Monu, Amarjeet @ Kunal and Karamvir @ Kala were planning to kill one Sanjit @ Bunty and Mintu @ Kaka or someone from their family. It is further submitted that Investigating Officer has not

even able to identify the persons, who were referred in the conversion as Sanjit @ Bunty and Mintu @ Kaka and whose murder was allegedly being planned.

Petitioner is in custody for more than two years. No arm was recovered from the petitioner.

Only mobile phone of the petitioner was seized.

Learned APP submits that eleven live cartridges were recovered. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that live cartridges were planted by the police.

Keeping in mind the totality of the facts and circumstances of this case, petitioner is admitted to bail, subject to his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of `10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial court. Bail application is disposed of in the above terms. Dasti. A.K. PATHAK, J.

DECEMBER 19, 2017 r.bararia