Icici Bank Ltd v. Jagendra

$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CM(M) 1219/2017 ICICI BANK LTD ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. Punit K. Bhalla, Adv.

Versus

JOGENDRA ..... Respondent Through:

None.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW

O R D E R

% 01.12.2017 CM No.43067/2017 (of the petitioner for modification of order dated 30th October, 2017) 1.

Vide order dated 30th October, 2017, this petition was allowed and representative of the petitioner / plaintiff / applicant appointed as Receiver for taking possession of the vehicle hypothecated with the petitioner / plaintiff / applicant. 2.

This application has been filed pleading that the make and registration number of the vehicle remained to be mentioned in the order. The petitioner / plaintiff / applicant has in the application, set out the make and registration number of the vehicle qua which orders were sought and have been granted. 3.

Considering the fact that the petition was allowed ex parte, need to issue notice of this application is not felt.

4.

The application is allowed.

5.

It is clarified that the make and registration number of the vehicle which the Receiver appointed vide order dated 30th October, 2017 has been empowered to take possession of, is as under:

Sl. No.

Make of the Vehicle Registration No. of the vehicle.

FORD ECOSPORT/1.5 TREND D UP-16AY-9138 RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J DECEMBER 01, 2017/'gsr'..