Prithvi Raj & ORS v. State & ANR

25# $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + PRITHVI RAJ & ORS ..... Petitioners Represented by:

Mr. Pawan Sharma, Advocate with petitioners in person.

versus THE STATE & ANR ..... Respondents Represented by:

Ms. Richa Kapoor, Additional Standing Counsel for State with Ms.Amita Sachdeva, Advocate with SI Amit Kumar, PS Krishna Nagar.

Respondent Nos. 2 in person.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA

O R D E R

% 28.08.2018 By the present petition, petitioners seek quashing of FIR No. 230/2013 under Sections 308/341/34 IPC registered at PS Krishna Nagar, Delhi on the complaint of respondent No.2 and the proceedings pursuant thereto on the ground that the parties have settled the matter. Learned Additional Standing Counsel for the State on instructions from Investigating Officer submits that in the above-noted FIR the three petitioners are the only accused and the respondent No. 2 the complainant/victim.

Respondent No. 2 is present in Court and is identified by the Investigating Officer. Respondent No.2 states that the petitioner No.1 is his brother and petitioner Nos. 2 and 3 are his nephews. He further states that

the FIR in question was got registered as quarrel took place between the parties due to the dispute between the families on property distribution. Respondent No. 2 also states that now all the issues have been resolved between the parties and the parties have amicably settled the matter before the Delhi Mediation Centre, Karkardooma Courts, copy whereof is annexed as Annexure-P3 to the present petition. In terms of the settlement he does not wish to pursue the above-noted FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto and undertake to abide by the terms of settlement. Petitioners who are present in Court and are identified by the learned counsel affirm the statement of respondent No.2 and undertake to abide by the terms of the settlement. Petitioners also assure that they will not indulge in such activities in future and to show remorse the petitioners undertake to deposit some costs also.

In view of the fact that the parties have amicably resolved their differences of their own free will, volition and without any coercion and no useful purpose will be served in continuance of the proceedings, it would be in the interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. There is no legal impediment in quashing the FIR in question.

Consequently, FIR No. 230/2013 under Sections 308/341/34 IPC registered at PS Krishna Nagar, Delhi and proceedings pursuant thereto are hereby quashed subject to each of the petitioners depositing cost of ₹10,000/- with the Chief Minister's Distress Relief Fund, Kerala within two weeks. Copy of the receipt will be placed on record within four weeks.

Parties have signed this order sheet in acknowledgment of their statements made before this Court.

Petition is disposed of. Order dasti.

MUKTA GUPTA, J.

AUGUST 28, 2018 'vn'