High Court of DelhiCRL.M.C./4958/2017

Rajendra Prasad Gupta @ Sai Baba & ANR. v. State NCT Of Delhi & ORS.

2017-11-29Hon'Ble Mr. Justice A.K. Pathak2 pages

$~81 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CRL.M.C. 4958/2017 & Crl. M.A. nos. 19671-72/2017 RAJENDRA PRASAD GUPTA @ SAI BABA & ANR.

..... Petitioners Through Mr.

Binay Kumar and Mr.

Abhimanyu Sharma, Advs.

versus STATE NCT OF DELHI & ORS.

..... Respondents Through Ms. Manjeet Arya, APP with SI Naveen, P.S. Subzi Mandi for the State Respondent nos.3 to 5 in person and respondent no. 3 also on behalf of respondent no. 2

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK

O R D E R

% 29.11.2017 It is submitted that petitioners and respondent nos. 2 to 5 are neighbours. A quarrel took place between them on some trivial matter, which had led to registration of the present FIR No.563/2014 under Sections 308/323/452/506/34 IPC at police station Subzi Mandi on the complaint of respondent no. 2 Ms. Vandana. Petitioners and respondent nos.2 to 5 have settled their disputes amicably, therefore, aforesaid FIR may be quashed. Respondent nos. 3 to 5 are present in Court and have been identified by SI

Naveen of police station Subzi Mandi.

Respondent no. 3 is father of respondent no. 2. Respondent nos. 3 to 5 submit that they have now settled the matter with the petitioners, vide a Memorandum of Understanding dated 6th November, 2017 (Annexre A-2), of their own free will, voluntarily and without any undue force, pressure or coercion. Respondent no. 3 submits that he has got instructions from respondent no. 2 to convey the court that respondent nol. 2 is not willing to pursue the FIR any further and the same may be quashed. Respondent no. 3 has identified signatures of respondent no. 2 in Memorandum of Understanding as well as receipt, which are at pages 50 to 54.

Keeping in view the settlement arrived at between the neighbours voluntarily, in the interest of justice, FIR No.563/2014 under Sections 308/323/452/506/34 IPC registered at police station Subzi Mandi and the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed. Petition is disposed of in the above terms. Miscellaneous applications are disposed of infructuous. Dasti.

A.K. PATHAK, J.

NOVEMBER 29, 2017 r.bararia