Vinod Kumar v. Union Of India And ORS.

$~48.

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(C) 9965/2017 and CM APPL. 40594/2017 VINOD KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. R.K. Shukla, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

..... Respondents Through: Mr. P.S. Singh and Ms. Swati Bansal, Advocates

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI

O R D E R

% 14.11.2017 1.

The limited grievance raised by the petitioner in the present petition is for issuing directions to the respondents to consider his representation dated 18.08.2017 and decide the same on merits.

2.

Mr. Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner had forwarded a representation dated 18.08.2017 through proper channel to the respondents stating inter alia that four Inspectors/CM, junior to him have been nominated above him, which is contrary to the rules. 3.

Learned counsel for the respondents, who appears on advance notice, states that the petitioner's representation is under active consideration of the Department and a decision thereon shall be taken very soon. W.P.(C) 9965/2017

4.

Having regard to the fact that the batch training is to commence on 27.11.2017, the respondents are directed to take a decision on the petitioner's pending representation on or before 18.11.2017, under written intimation to him.

5.

The petition is disposed of alongwith the pending applications. HIMA KOHLI, J REKHA PALLI, J NOVEMBER 14, 2017 rkb/na W.P.(C) 9965/2017