High Court of DelhiW.P.(C)/9183/2015

Ashish Private Iti v. Directorate General Of Employment & Training & ORS

2015-09-28Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Shakdher3 pages

$~43 to 47 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 9180/2015 HRD PRIVATE ITI ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjay Sharawat and Mr. Ratish Kumar, Advocates versus DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Manish Mohan and Mr. Shivam Chanana, Advocate for R-1 Mr. Vikas Chopra, Advocate for R-2 + W.P.(C) 9181/2015 VIVEKANAND PRIVATE ITI ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjay Sharawat and Mr. Ratish Kumar, Advocates versus DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING AND ORS.

..... Respondents Through: Mr. Manish Mohan and Mr. Shivam Chanana, Advocate for R-1 Mr. Vikas Chopra, Advocate for R-2 + W.P.(C) 9182/2015 ANMOL PRIVATE ITI ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjay Sharawat and Mr. Ratish Kumar, Advocates versus WP(C) 9180/2015 Page 1 of 3

DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF EMPLOYMENT & TRAINING & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Ajay Digpaul, Ms. Medha Arya and Ms. Rishika Katyal, Advocates for R-1 Mr. Vikas Chopra, Advocate for R-3 + W.P.(C) 9183/2015 ASHISH PRIVATE ITI ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjay Sharawat and Mr. Ratish Kumar, Advocates versus DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF EMPLOYMENT & TRAINING & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Ajay Digpaul, Ms. Medha Arya and Ms. Rishika Katyal, Advocates for R-1 Mr. Vikas Chopra, Advocate for R-3 + W.P.(C) 9188/2015 L J PRIVATE ITI & ANR ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Sanjay Sharawat and Mr. Ratish Kumar, Advocates versus DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF EMPLOYMENT & TRAINING & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Ajay Digpaul, Ms. Medha Arya and Ms. Rishika Katyal, Advocates for R-1 Mr. Vikas Chopra, Advocate for R-3

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER WP(C) 9180/2015 Page 2 of 3

O R D E R

% 28.09.2015 The learned counsel for the parties inform me that the captioned petitions are covered by a judgment passed by this court dated 24.09.2015, in a batch of writ petitions, in which the lead petition was : WP(C) 8849/2015, titled : Mata Santosh Devi Private ITI Vs. Directorate General of Employment and Training and Ors.

Accordingly, the captioned petitions are allowed. The respondents will act, as per the directions issued in the aforesaid judgment. RAJIV SHAKDHER, J SEPTEMBER 28, 2015 yg WP(C) 9180/2015 Page 3 of 3