← Library
High Court of DelhiW.P.(C)/10996/2017

Bishwajit Sen Gupta v. Director Of Education And ORS.

2017-12-11Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Sunil Gaur2 pages

$~21 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 10996/2017 & CM 44969/2017 BISHWAJIT SEN GUPTA ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. Atul Kumar and Mr.

Abhimanyu Sharma, Advocates versus DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION AND ORS.

.....Respondents Through:

Ms.Ritu Kumari, Md. Deepshikha Goyal and Ms. UrvashiTripathi, Advocates for respondent-DOE

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR

O R D E R

% 11.12.2017 Petitioner is aggrieved by lack of response to his Legal Notice of 4th September, 2017 (Annexure P-5) vide which he has sought release of Transport Allowance.

Notice.

Ms.Ritu Kumari, Advocate accepts notice on behalf of first respondent-DOE.

In the facts and circumstances of this case, this petition is disposed of with, direction to respondent No.1 to deal with petitioner's Legal Notice (Annexure P-5) while treating it to be a Representation, if not already done, within a period of twelve weeks from today and the fate of Legal Notice/Representation (Annexure P-5) be made known to petitioner within two weeks thereafter, so that petitioner may avail of the remedies, W.P.(C) 10996/2017

as available in law, if need be. Needless to say, if the relief sought by petitioner in the Legal Notice/Representation (Annexure P-5) is not granted, then reasons for not doing so, be spelt out by first respondent. With aforesaid directions, this petition and the application are disposed of.

(SUNIL GAUR) JUDGE DECEMBER 11, 2017 s W.P.(C) 10996/2017