High Court of DelhiW.P.(C)/10039/2017

Vinod Trading Company v. Commissioner Of Vat & ANR.

2017-12-18Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Sanjiv Khanna,Hon'Ble Ms. Justice Prathiba M. Singh2 pages

Signed By:RAM DATT Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing.

$-13 to 16 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(C) 9789/2017 SAL RAM TRADERS ..... Petitioner Through Mr. M.A. Ansari Khursheed Ahmad, Advocate.

versus i COMMISSIONER OF V AT & ANR.

. .... Respondents Through None (t + W.P.(C) 9790/2017 e S.S ENTERPRISES ..... Petitioner • . Through Mr. M.A. Ansari Khursheed Ahmad, Advocate versus COMMISSIONER OF V AT & ANR.

..... Respondents Through Mr. Avtar Singh, Advocate.

+ W.P.(C) 10017/2017 SAPTHA GIRL ENTERPRISES ..... Petitioner Through Mr. M.A. Ansari Khursheed Ahmad, Advocate e versus e ,..

COMMISSIONER OF VAT & ANR.

..... Respondents Through None + W.P.(C) 10039/2017 VINOD TRADING COMPANY ..... Petitioner Through Mr. M.A. Ansari Khursheed Ahmad, Advocate

• versus COMMISSIONER OF V AT & ANR.

. .... Respondents Through Mr. Varun Nischal, Advocate.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIVKHANNA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH

ORDER

0/0 18.12.2017 It is stated by the counsel for the parties that refunds have been processed and orders have been passed. The petitioners, Jf aggrieved ",.

t': ....:;...

by an order for non-payment of interestt-are at liberty to challenge the same in accordance with law.

In view of the statement and in terms of the aforesaid observation, the writ petitions are disposed of. SANJIV KHANNA, J.

PRA THIBA M. SINGH, J.

DECEMBER 18, 2017 mw/mr \