← Library
High Court of DelhiCRL.M.C./51/2018

Jhony v. The State NCT Of Delhi & ORS

2018-01-05Hon'Ble Mr. Justice A.K. Pathak2 pages

$~28 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CRL.M.C. 51/2018 JHONY ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. Rajan Kumar Prasad, Adv. along with petitioner in person.

versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI & ORS ..... Respondents Through:

Dr.

M.P.

Singh, APP with ASI Ravinder, P.S. Mangol Puri.

Mr. Narender Singh Biduri, Adv. for R-2 to R-4 along with R-2 to R-4 in person.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK

O R D E R

% 05.01.2018 It is submitted that petitioner and respondent nos. 2 to 4 are related to each other. Petitioner is nephew of respondent no.2; whereas respondent no. 3 is daughter of respondent no.2 and wife of respondent no. 4. A quarrel took place between them on some trivial issue which led to registration of FIR No. 199/2013 under Sections 324/34 IPC registered at police station Mangol Puri, on the complaint of respondent no.2. In the said incident, respondent nos. 3 and 4 sustained injuries. It is further submitted that with the intervention of their elders, petitioner and respondent nos. 2 to 4 have settled their disputes amicably vide Memorandum of Understanding dated 8th June, 2017. Petitioner has paid `1 lac to the respondent nos. 3 and 4 in

order to compensate them towards the medical treatment received by them. Respondent nos. 2 to 4 are present in Court along with their counsel and have been identified by ASI Ravinder of police station Mangol Puri. These respondents submit that they have settled the matter of their own free will and without any undue force, pressure or coercion and they have no objection in quashing of the FIR.

Respondent nos. 3 and 4 also admit having received settled amount of `1 lac from the petitioner. Keeping in mind that a settlement has been arrived at between the petitioners and respondent nos. 2 to 4 voluntarily and these respondents have no objection in quashing of the FIR, in the interest of justice, aforesaid FIR and the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed. Petition is disposed of in the above terms. Miscellaneous application is disposed of as infructuous.

Dasti.

A.K. PATHAK, J.

JANUARY 05, 2018 ga