Ikluvdeep Singh v. The State NCT Of Delhi

$~37 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 2305/2017 IKLUVDEEP SINGH ..... Petitioner Through Ms. Kirti Uppal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Suresh Sharma and Mr.

Mohit Bhandari, Advocates versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through Mr. Arun Kumar Sharma, APP for State

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR

O R D E R

% 14.11.2017 CRL. M.A.18590/2017 (Exemption) Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of.

BAIL APPLN. 2305/2017 The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in connection with FIR No.118/2017 dated 08.05.2017 (P.S. Maya Puri) instituted for offences under Sections 364A, 365, 506 and 34 of the IPC. The complainant/Rohan Kumar, aged about 19 years, was allegedly made to sit on a two-wheeler, whereafter he was taken to a place from where he was recovered.

It was alleged that one Jaswinder Singh, who had monetary transaction with the father of the complainant, was pressurizing him to bring money from his father.

Mr.

Kitri Uppal, learned senior advocate while pressing the anticipatory bail application of the petitioner, submitted that some of the other co-accused persons have been granted anticipatory bail by the court below.

The father of the petitioner, viz. Jaswinder Singh, who is the main accused of this case, has been granted regular bail by the court below. The petitioner is not named in the FIR and his name only transpired later as one of the persons who had forced the complainant to go to a particular place from where he was made to make a telephone call to his father to bring money.

The dispute between Jaswinder Singh (father of the petitioner) and the father of the complainant as has been stated by the petitioner, has already been settled and a deed of settlement has also been brought on record. Though this court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail but keeping in mind the facts of the case, it is directed that the petitioner shall surrender before the court below and pray for bail and the trial court, in that event, is requested to take into account the aforesaid facts, specially the grant of bail to the father of petitioner and settlement of disputes between the parties and pass necessary orders accordingly.

The application is disposed of with the aforesaid observation. Dasti.

ASHUTOSH KUMAR, J NOVEMBER 14, 2017 ns