Sandeep Sharma @ Sandeep Kumar Sharma v. State & ANR

$~64 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 4974/2017 SANDEEP SHARMA @ SANDEEP KUMAR SHARMA ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. Neeraj Chaudhary, Advocate with petitionr in person.

versus STATE & ANR ..... Respondents Through:

Ms. Anita Abraham, APP for State with SI Nakul, PS M. Enclave.

Mr. A.S. Sharma, Advocate with respondent No.2.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL

O R D E R

% 29.11.2017 The instant petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking quashing of FIR No.14/2013, under Sections 354/506/509 IPC registered at Police Station-Maurya Enclave, Delhi on the complaint of respondent No.2 and the proceedings pursuant thereto on the ground that the parties have amicably settled their disputes.

Respondent No.2 is present in Court today and is identified by learned counsel and the Investigating Officer. She states that she has settled the matter with the petitioners with her own free will and choice without any threat, pressure and coercion as per Compromise Deed dated 31.10.2017 and she does not wish to pursue the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto.

Statements of the parties have been recorded separately. CRL.M.C. 4974/2017

In view of the fact that the parties have amicably resolved their differences voluntarily out of their own free will and without any coercion, pressure, and no useful purpose will be served in continuance of the proceedings. It would be in the interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. There is no legal impediment in quashing the FIR in question. Consequently, FIR No.14/2013, under Sections 354/506/509 IPC registered at Police StationMaurya Enclave, Delhi and all the proceedings pursuant thereto are hereby quashed.

The petition is disposed of.

SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, J NOVEMBER 29, 2017 afa CRL.M.C. 4974/2017