← Library
High Court of DelhiCRL.M.C./4795/2017

Geeta Gupta v. M/S Nivedan Fin Invest Lease Ltd & ANR

2018-02-07Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Sachdeva2 pages

$18 & 19 *

IN THE HIGH COURT

+ CRL.M.C. 4794/20 17 + CRL.M.C. 4795/20 17 OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI GEETA GUPTA Petitioner Through Mr. Mohit Mathur, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Abhilash Mathur, Mr. Manoj Pant, Mr. Sumit Misra and Mr.

Mayank Sharma, Advocates.

versus MIS NIVEDAN FIN INVEST LEASE LTD & ANR .....Respondents Through Mr. Kamal Bahi with Ms. Ambika Mishra, Advocates for respondent No.1.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA

ORDER

% 07.02.2018 CRL.M.C. 4794/2017, Crl.M.A. 19102/2017 (stay) & CRL.M.C. 4795/2017 , CrI.M.A.1 9106/2017 (stay) The petitioner is aggrieved by order dated 01.06.2017, whereby, non-bailable warrants qua the petitioner were issued. It is informed that the petitioner has already appeared before the trial Court and submitted to its jurisdiction and has been admitted to bail. Learned senior counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would like to sit with the respondents and amicably try and resolve the disputes. He submits that the parties may be referred to mediation. Learned counsel for the respondent No.1 submits that the respondent is agreeable to sitting across the table, however, such a By:AMULYA CRL.M.C. 4794/20/7 & Puge I CRL.M.C. 4795/2017

V p.

request can always be made to the Trial Court. In view of the above, no further orders are called for in the petition.

The petition is, accordingly, disposed of.

Needless to state that the petitioner always has liberty to approach the Trial Court for referring the parties to mediation. ACHDEVA, J FEBRUARY 07, 2018 St CRL. Al. C. 4794/2017 & CRL.M.C. 4795/2017