Print Time v. Commissioner, Trade & Taxes & ANR.

$~15 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 10528/2017 PRINT TIME ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Surinder Goel and Mr. Shivam Goel, Advs.

versus COMMISSIONER, TRADE & TAXES & ANR. ..... Respondents Through Mr. Mukul Lathere, Proxy Counsel for Mr. Siddharth Dutta, Adv.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR

O R D E R

% 07.02.2018 Learned counsel for the respondent states that vide notice dated 29.01.2018, the petitioner was asked to furnish documents and the documents were furnished.

Without going into the said controversy, we direct the petitioner/authorized representative to visit the office of the Value Added Tax Officer (VATO) on 21.02.2018 at 11:00 a.m. On the said date, the VATO will give the details of documents, if any, which are required in writing. Thereafter, the petitioner will furnish documents or will explain why the said documents are not required. Contentions would be examined and order in accordance with law would be passed by the VATO within one month from the date fixed. In case the petitioner is entitled to refund, the same would be granted along with interest if payable and in accordance with law. The petitioner, if

aggrieved, would be entitled to challenge the order passed by the VATO in accordance with law.

With the aforesaid directions and observations, the writ petition is disposed of.

Dasti.

SANJIV KHANNA, J CHANDER SHEKHAR, J FEBRUARY 07, 2018 b