Salim Ahmad v. South Delhi Municipal Corporation And ORS.

$~45 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(C) 10991/2017 SALIM AHMAD ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. Rahul Kumar, proxy counsel for Mr. Sitab Ali Chaudhary, Advocate.

versus SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ORS.

..... Respondents Through:

Mr. Rakesh Mittal, Standing Counsel with Mr. Kamlesh Anand & Yamini Mittal, Advocates for R 1 & 2.

Ms. Swaty Singh Malik, Adv. with Ms. Yaashna, Adv. for R 3 & 4 Mr. M.K. Khan, Adv. for R 5 & 6

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA

O R D E R

% 13.12.2017 CM APPL. 44957/2017 (Exemption) Allowed subject to just exceptions.

W.P.(C) 10991/2017 and CM APPL. 44956/2017 (stay) Mr. Khan, ld. counsel for the respondent nos.5 and 6 submits that the subject construction is being raised as per the on-line sanction of the building plan. Mr. Mittal, ld. Standing Counsel for respondentSouth Delhi Municipal Corporation, on instructions, concedes to that effect. Mr. Mittal, ld. counsel for respondent-SDMC submits that in the event any deviation takes place, the respondent shall take steps

though the construction getting raised is only at the threshold and at this given stage, no action is required.

In the given situation, the petition is pre-mature, and is dismissed accordingly. Pending application also stands disposed off.

A. K. CHAWLA, J DECEMBER 13, 2017 nn