M/S Bdr Lifesciences Pvt Ltd v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company & ANR

$^^6 & 7 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ FAO(OS) 571/2015 BDR PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED Appellant Representedby:

Ms.RajeshwariH., Advocate versus BRISTOL-MYERSSQUIBBCOMPANY& ORS Respondents Representedby:

Mr.PravinAnand,Advocatewith Mr.Nishchal Anand and Mr.Aman Taneja, Advocates FAO(OS) 573/2015 M/S BDR LIFESCIENCES PVT LTD Appellant Representedby:

Ms.RajeshwariH., Advocate versus BRISTOL-MYERSSQUIBBCOMPANY& ANR Respondents Representedby:

Mr.PravinAnand,Advocatewith Mr.Nishchal Anand and Mr.Aman Taneja, Advocates

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA

ORDER

% 23.02.2016 CM No.23117/2015 inFAO COS) No.571/2015 CM No.23122/2015 in FAQ rOS^No.573/2015 For the reasons stated in the two applicationsdelay of 63 days in By:AMULYA

ly filing the appeals is condoned.

The applications are disposed of.

FAQ rOS) No.571/2015 & 573/2015 1.

Learned counsel for the appellantsstates that she has been instructed bythe appellantsto withdrawtheabovecaptionedappeals. 2.

Shestatesthatthe appellantsare intouchwiththe respondentsto seek a permission/licensefrom them concerningthe patentinquestion. 3.

Learned counsel for the respondentsstates that the respondentshave no objectionto the appealsbeingwithdrawnwithoutimpositionof any cost upon the appellants, 4.

The appealsareaccordinglydismissedaswithdrawn. 5.

No costs.

CMNo.23116/2015 inFAO No.571/2015 CM No.23121/2015 in FAQ TOS^No.573/2015 Dismissed as not pressed.

PRADEEP NA >JOG, MUKTA GUPTA, J.

FEBRUARY 23, 2016 mamta