Rajvinder Kaur v. Directorate Of Education & ORS

$~15«fel7 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI I

(i) + W.P.(C) 9518/2015 & CM APPLN.22407/2015 RAMANJIT KAUR WALIA Petitioner Through:

Mr. J.S. Lamba, Mr. Ahmad Shahrooz and Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocates versus DIRECTORATE OF EDUCATION & ORS Respondents Through:

Mr. Peeyush Kalra, ASC for respondent No. 1 Mr. Jasmeet Singh, Advocate for respondent No.2 (ii) + W.p.rci 9523/2015 & CM APPLN.22414/2015 RAJVINDER KAUR Petitioner Through:

Mr. J.S. Lamba, Mr. Ahmad Shahrooz and Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocates versus DIRECTORATE OF EDUCATION & ORS Respondents Through:

Mr. Peeyush Kalra, ASC for respondent No.

Mr. Jasmeet Singh, Advocate for respondent No.2

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR.

JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR

ORDER

% 06.10.2015 Since the relief sought in above captioned two petitions is sought on identical grounds, therefore, with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, both these petitions were heard together and by this common order, they are being disposed of.

Upon resignation, petitioners had sought the release of arrears of W.Ps. (C) 9518 & By:AMULYA

salary alongwith gratuity, provident fund, etc., from respondent-School vide applications of 30"" October, 2014 (Annexure P-8 colly.) and ll"" November, 2014 (Annexure P-10 colly.).

Learned counsel for petitioners relies upon decisions of this Court in Smt. Mridul Sharma v. Director ofEducation & Ors. 2010 SCC Online Del. 2633 and Anuradha Gulati v. Directorate of Education and Anr. 2013 SCC Online Del. 2512 to seek the relief as claimed in these petitions.

Considering the facts and circumstances of this case, these petitions are disposed of with direction to respondent-School to consider and decide petitioners' applications (Annexure P-8 & P-10 colly.) in light of the decisions in Smt. Mridul (supra) and Anuradha Gulati (supra) within a period of eight weeks. The decision taken on the applications (Annexure P-8 & P-10 colly.) be made known to petitioners within a week thereafter. In case petitioners are not satisfied with the decision taken on their applications, then they will have the remedies as available in law. If respondent-School chooses not to grant the relief claimed in the aforesaid applications (Annexure P-8 & P-10 colly.), then reasons for declining the relief claimed be made known to petitioners.

With aforesaid directions, the above captioned two petitions and the applications are disposed of.

Copy of this order be given dasti to both the sides. (SUNIL GAUR) JUDGE OCTOBER 06, 2015 s W.Ps. (C) 9518 & 9523 of 2015