← Library
High Court of DelhiCM(M)/10/2018

Sunil Kumar & ANR v. Raj Bala & ORS

2018-01-08Hon'Ble Mr. Justice R.K.Gauba2 pages

$~1 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CM(M) 10/2018 and CM 213/2018 SUNIL KUMAR & ANR ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. M.L. Kalra, Advocate versus RAJ BALA & ORS ..... Respondents Through

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA

O R D E R

% 08.01.2018 The petition at hand challenges the order dated 18.08.2017 of the Additional District Judge whereby two applications of the petitioners (defendants before the Civil Judge) were dismissed with costs of Rs.2,000/-, first, an application under Order XIX Rule 3 CPC read with Order XIII and Section 151 CPC and the other, under Order XVI read with Section 151 CPC.

By the second said application, objection had been taken to the list of witnesses being allowed to be filed by the opposite party (plaintiffs before the civil Court) belatedly. The trial judge has noted in the order that the list of witnesses alongwith affidavits were taken on record on 18.11.2016 subject to costs being imposed which were tendered by the opposite party and accepted by the petitioners.

The discretion having been exercised judicially and the condition of costs having been duly complied with, CM(M) 10/2018

the objection reiterated through the petition at hand is found to be wholly frivolous.

As far as the other application is concerned, the petitioners take exception to the affidavits of three witnesses which were submitted seeking their rejection on the ground that they do not satisfy the requirement of Order XIX Rule 3 CPC. The affidavits have already been tendered in evidence and the witnesses are yet to be crossexamined by the petitioner through counsel. All objections with regard to the admissibility of the said affidavits in evidence or relevancy of the documents filed therewith can be taken during the course of deposition under cross-examination. The application has been appropriately considered and rejected by the additional District Judge through the impugned order.

The petition is found to be devoid of substance and is dismissed in limine with costs of Rs.20,000/-.

The pending application also stands dismissed.

R.K.GAUBA, J JANUARY 08, 2018 Yg CM(M) 10/2018