Icici Bank Ltd v. Himanshu Tyagi

$~7 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ FAO 4/2016 ICICI BANK LTD ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Chetna Bhalla, Advocate versus HIMANSHU TYAGI ..... Respondent Through

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER

O R D E R

% 05.01.2016 CM No.118/2016 (Exemption) Allowed subject to just exceptions.

CM No.119/2016 (condonation of delay in re-filing) This is an application seeking condonation of delay of 49 days in re-filing the appeal.

For the reasons given therein, the delay is condoned and the application is allowed.

FAO 4/2016 The learned counsel for the appellant says that she has instructions to withdraw the appeal as the trial court has, in the interregnum, appointed a receiver.

The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn. RAJIV SHAKDHER, J JANUARY 05, 2016/yg