Ritika Awasty v. State NCT Of Delhi & ORS

$~2 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(CRL) 2239/2015, Crl. M.A. nos. 14774/2015, 15112/2015 and 17440-41/2015 RITIKA AWASTY ..... Petitioner Through : Mr. Jaspal Singh, Adv.

versus STATE NCT OF DELHI & ORS ..... Respondents Through :Mr. Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel for respondent no. 1 Mr.

Vikram Jetly, CGSC for respondent nos. 2 to 4 Mr.

V.K.

Mehra, Adv.

for the complainant Mr.

Sanjeev Mahajan, Adv.

for Interveners

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK

O R D E R

% 11.08.2016 Mr. Jaspal Singh, Advocate, who has appeared for Mr. Mohammad Ali Khan, Advocate submits that petitioner has stopped instructing Mr. Mohammad Ali Khan, Advocate, therefore, he may be discharged from the brief. Since, petitioner has stopped giving instructions to Mr. Mohammad Ali Khan, Advocate, he is discharged from the brief. No one appears for the petitioner. Dismissed in default. All other miscellaneous applications are disposed of as infructuous. A.K. PATHAK, J.

AUGUST 11, 2016/rb