Vinay Mishra & ORS v. The State Govt Of NCT Of Delhi & ORS

$~22 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CRL.M.C. 5096/2017 VINAY MISHRA & ORS ..... Petitioners Through:

Mr. Umesh Chandra Mishra, Adv.

versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ..... Respondents Through:

Dr. M.P. Singh, APP for State with ASI Om Prakash, P.S. New Ashok Nagar.

Mr. Lokesh Kumar Mishra, Adv. for R-2 along with R-2 in person.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK

O R D E R

% 19.02.2018 Respondent no.2-Ms. Reena Mishra is present in Court along with her counsel and has been identified by ASI Om Prakash of police station New Ashok Nagar. Respondent no.2 submits that she has settled the matter with the petitioner no.1 before the Delhi Mediation Centre, Karkardooma Court, Delhi on 18th December, 2013 of her own free will and without any undue force, pressure or coercion. She further submits that her marriage with petitioner no.1 has already been dissolved by a decree of divorce by mutual consent passed by the Family Court, Vishwas Nagar, Delhi on 14th November, 2014. Petitioner no.1 has paid `1.50 lacs to the respondent no.2 today in Court vide demand draft, photocopy whereof has been placed on

record. Respondent no.2 submits that entire settled amount of `6 lacs stands paid with this payment. Petitioner has also paid another sum of `15,000/- to the respondent no.2 towards the delayed payment. Respondent no.2 has no objection in case the FIR is quashed against the petitioner no.1 and his relatives, that is, petitioner nos. 2 to 4.

Keeping in mind that a settlement has been arrived at between the petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 voluntarily, in the interest of justice, FIR No. 356/2011 under Sections 498A/406/506/34 IPC registered at police station New Ashok Nagar and the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.

Petition is disposed of in the above terms.

Dasti.

A.K. PATHAK, J.

FEBRUARY 19, 2018/ga