Crocs Inc Usa v. Relaxo Footwear Ltd

$~37-46 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO (OS) 305/2017, CM APPL.44188-44190/2017 CROCS INC USA ..... Appellant versus ACTION SHOES PVT LTD & ANR ..... Respondents FAO (OS) 306/2017, CM APPL.44191-44193/2017 CROCS INC USA ..... Appellant versus BATA INDIA LTD ..... Respondent FAO (OS) (COMM) 206/2017, CM APPL.44164-44166/2017 CROCS INC USA ..... Appellant versus LIBERTY SHOES LTD & ANR ..... Respondents FAO (OS) (COMM) 207/2017, CM APPL.44167-44169 CROCS INC USA ..... Appellant versus LIBERTY SHOES LTD & ORS ..... Respondents FAO (OS) (COMM) 208/2017, CM APPL.44170-44172/2017 CROCS INC USA ..... Appellant versus RELAXO FOOTWEAR LTD ..... Respondent FAO (OS) (COMM) 209/2017, CM APPL.44173-44175/2017 CROCS INC USA ..... Appellant versus BATA INDIA LTD ..... Respondent FAO (OS) (COMM) 210/2017, CM APPL.44176-44178/2017 CROCS INC USA ..... Appellant versus RELAXO FOOTWEAR LTD ..... Respondent

FAO (OS) (COMM) 211/2017, CM APPL.44179-44181/2017 CROCS INC USA ..... Appellant versus BIOWORLD MERCHANDISING INDIA LTD & ANR Respondents FAO (OS) (COMM) 212/2017, CM APPL.44182-44184/2017 CROCS INC USA ..... Appellant versus BIOWORLD MERCHANDISING INDIA LTD & ANR Respondents FAO (OS) (COMM) 213/2017, CM APPL.44185-44187/2017 CROCS INC USA ..... Appellant versus ACTION SHOES PVT LTD & ORS ..... Respondents Appearance: Mr. Ravinder Sethi, Sr. Advocate with Mr. S.K. Bansal, Mr. Ajay Amitabh Suman, Mr. Pankaj Kumar and Mr. Kapil Kumar Giri, Advocates for appellants, in all matters. Mr. Neeraj Grover with Ms. Kanika Bajaj and Mr. Mehak Nakara, Advocates for respondents/Bata in Item-38&42. Mr. Jayant Mehta with Mr. Kapil Wadhwa, Ms. Devyani Nath and Mr. Shubhankar, Advocates for respondents in Items-39&40. Mr. Kapil Wadhwa and Ms. Devyani Nath, Advocates for respondents in Items-37&46.

Mr. Anil Dutt with Ms. Vindhya S. Mani, Advocates for R-1 in Items-44&45.

Mr. M.K. Miglani with Mr. Gaurav Miglani, Advocates for respondents in Items-41&43.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA

O R D E R

% 05.12.2017 This Court is of the opinion that the orders in this case have not determined the respective rights and the liabilities of the parties. In

these circumstances, learned counsel seeks liberty to withdraw these appeals and approach the Court as and when any order on the merits of the applications under Order-XXXIX Rule-1&2 and Order-XXXIX Rule-4, CPC are made. It goes without saying that all rights and contentions of the parties to urge the submissions that are available in law are kept open. The appeals are dismissed as withdrawn, along with all the pending applications.

A copy of this order be given under the signatures of Court Master to the parties.

S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J DECEMBER 05, 2017 /vikas/