Sunil Kumar v. State

$~2 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(CRL) 3472/2017 SUNIL KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through :

Ms.Saahila Lamba, Advocate.

versus STATE ..... Respondent Through :

Ms.Nandita Rao, ASC with SI Jasmer Singh, PS Jahangir Puri.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG

O R D E R

% 08.01.2018 1.

The instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed on behalf of the petitioner for seeking parole for a period of three months. Status report is on record.

2.

Nominal Roll dated 22.11.2017 reveals that the petitioner was convicted under Sections 302/324/34 IPC and was sentenced to undergo RI for life imprisonment with fine ` 3,500/-. Crl.A.144/1994 was dismissed by this Court on 17.09.2009. Nominal Roll further reveals that the petitioner has already undergone seven years, two months and eighteen days incarceration besides remission for one year, five months and twenty-four days as on 20.11.2017. It further reveals that his overall jail conduct is satisfactory. Earlier he was granted parole / furlough on several occasions and there are no allegations of its misuse.

3.

In the interest of justice and for the reasons mentioned in the writ petition, the petitioner is granted two weeks parole from the date of his release, on his furnishing personal bond in the sum of `20,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court/CMM/Duty Magistrate. After completion of parole period, the petitioner shall surrender before the Jail Superintendent. 4.

Writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms. S.P.GARG, J.

JANUARY 08, 2018 / tr