Jagmal v. The State Govt Of NCT Of Delhi

$~42 & 43 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CRL.REV.P. 925/2017 & CRL.M.A. 20369/2017 JAGMAL ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Satyam Thareja, Advocate versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through Mr. Hirein Sharma, Addl. PP for the State Mr. Ramesh Prasad Singh, ATO, PS, M.S. Park + CRL.REV.P. 932/2017 & CRL.M.A. 20563/2017 SURAJ BHAN ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Satyam Thareja, Advocate versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through Mr. Hirein Sharma, Addl. PP for the State Mr. Ramesh Prasad Singh, ATO, PS, M.S. Park

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA

O R D E R

% 26.02.2020 1.

Petitioners, in these proceedings, impugn order on charge. 2.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that since there was no stay of the trial, trial has concluded and the petitioners CRL.REV.P. 925/2017

have already been acquitted by the trial court and as such the petitions have become infructuous.

3.

In view thereof, the petitions are disposed of as infructuous. SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J FEBRUARY 26, 2020 'rs'

CRL.REV.P. 925/2017