Arun Rai v. State

$~4 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ BAIL APPLN. 2541/2017 ARUN RAI ..... Petitioner Through :

Mr.S.K.Rai, Advocate.

versus STATE ..... Respondent Through :

Mr.Ravi Nayak, APP with SI Arvind Kumar, PS Jaitpur.

Mr.Vikas Jain, Advocate for the complainant.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG

O R D E R

% 20.04.2018 1.

The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in case FIR No.546/2017 registered under Sections 363/376D/344/328 IPC and Section 4 POCSO Act at PS Jaitpur. Status report is on record. 2.

I have heard the learned counsel for the parties including the counsel for the complainant and have examined the file. By an order dated 11.12.2017, the petitioner was granted interim protection and was directed to join the investigation as and when required. Indisputably, the petitioner has joined the investigation since then.

3.

It is informed that the charge-sheet has since been filed before the Court against the present petitioner.

4.

In view of the changed circumstances, the petitioner is granted protection for fifteen days against arrest to enable him to move application for regular bail before the Court concerned.

The application for regular bail, if so moved, shall be decided on merits. 5.

The application stands disposed of in the above terms. APRIL 20, 2018 / tr S.P.GARG, J.