High Court of DelhiCRL.M.C./5192/2017

Naveen Malhotra v. The State & ANR.

2017-12-12Hon'Ble Mr. Justice A.K. Pathak5 pages

$~66 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 5192/2017 and Crl.M.A. Nos. 20455-56/2017 NAVEEN MALHOTRA ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr.Nitish Chaudhary, Advocate versus THE STATE & ANR.

..... Respondents Through:

Mr. Kamal Kr. Ghei, APP for State

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA

O R D E R

% On behalf of the petitioner it has been submitted that the identical matters being Crl.M.C.Nos.5194/2017, 5203/2017, 5210/2017,5212/2017, 5215/2017, 5217/2017, 5218/2017, 5220/2017, 5221/2017, 5223/2017 and 5225/2017 are listed before the Bench of Hon‟ble Mr.Justice A.K.Pathak for the day and it is submitted that the present matter be also placed before the same Hon‟ble Bench. In view thereof, subject to orders of the Hon‟ble the Acting Chief Justice the CRL.M.C. 5192/2017 be placed before the Bench of Hon'ble Mr.Justice A.K.Pathak today, i.e., 12.12.2017 at 2:30 p.m. DECEMBER 12, 2017/sv

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI: NEW DELHI

STATEMENT OF SI SOMVIR POLICE STATION SEEMAPURI. ON S.A.

I identify the petitioner No.1 Shri Munna Shah, petitioners No.2 Shri Guddu, petitioners No.3 Shri Gulsher and petitioners No.4 Mohd. Umar as the accused and the complainant/prosecutrix Ms. Robbi arrayed as respondent No.2 in the FIR No.370/16, under Sections 451/354/354(A)/354(B)/323/509/34 of IPC, 1860 at Police Station Seemapuri present in the Court today. Apart from the petitioner nos. 1-4, named in the above stated FIR, there are no other persons arrayed as the accused in relation to the present FIR No.370/16, under Sections 451/354/354(A)/354(B)/323/509/34 of IPC, 1860 at Police Station Seemapuri.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI: NEW DELHI

CW-2 STATEMENT OF MST. X W/O SHRI ISAB ALI AGED 32 YEARS R/O H.NO.153, GALI NO.4, SHANKAR VIHAR, PALAM VIHAR, GURGAON, HARYANA.

On S.A.

I have brought my original Aadhar Card, photocopy of which is on the record as Ex. CW2/A (original seen and returned). I have studied up to standard 10th. I have come for a compromise in relation to the case against father-in-law, brother-in-law and relatives of my sister. The petitioner nos. 1 to 4 are the aforesaid persons in the FIR No.370/16, Police Station Seemapuri. My affidavit bears my signatures thereon at point A and B on Ex. CW2/B and the compromise deed bears my signatures at point A on Ex. CW2/C which I have signed voluntarily of my own accord without any duress, coercion or pressure from any quarter. I have no opposition to the Crl. M.C. 4874/17 filed by the petitioner nos. 1 to 4 seeking quashing of the FIR No.

370/16, under Sections 451/354/354(A)/354(B)/323/509/34 of IPC, 1860 at Police Station Seemapuri being allowed and I do not seek that the petitioner no.1 Shri Munna Shah, petitioners no.2 Shri Guddu, petitioners no.3 Shri Gulsher and petitioners no.4 Mohd. Umar be punished in relation thereto and I have no opposition to the quashing of consequential proceedings emanating therefrom in relation to the said FIR.

I have made this statement voluntarily of my own accord without any duress, coercion or pressure from any quarter.

CW-3 STATEMENT OF MR. ISAB ALI S/O SHRI YASIM ALI AGED 38 YEARS R/O H.NO.153, GALI NO.4, SHANKAR VIHAR, PALAM VIHAR, GURGAON, HARYANA.

The respondent no.2, prosecutrix of the FIR No.370/16, Police Station Seemapuri is my wife and I live with her. I have no opposition to the FIR No.370/16, under Sections 451/354/354(A)/354(B)/323/509/34 of IPC, 1860 at Police Station Seemapuri and all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom being quashed. I have brought my original Aadhar Card bearing no. 315844773670, photocopy of which is taken on record as CW3/A (original seen and returned).