Shree Vats Buildcon Pvt Ltd. v. Capital Builders

$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ARB.P. 828/2017 SHREE VATS BUILDCON PVT LTD.

..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. Rajat Aneja, Ms. Chandrika Gupta, Advs. alongwith Mr. Pramod Bindal, Director in person.

versus CAPITAL BUILDERS ..... Respondent Through:

Mr. Sudhanshu Batra, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Ravi Varma, Ms. Shneya Jain and Mr. Aditya Mishra, Advs.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER

O R D E R

% 26.10.2018 I.A. 7078/2018 1.

Allowed, subject to just exceptions.

ARB.P. 828/2017 & I.A. 4319/2018 2.

I may point out that in the previous order i.e., the order dated 9.8.2018, the appearance of counsel on behalf of the petitioner has been incorrectly recorded.

3.

Mr. Sudhanshu Batra, learned senior counsel, who, appears for the respondent has also been shown as the counsel for the petitioner. 3.1 The record shall show otherwise.

ARB.P. 828/2017

4.

All other directions contained in the order dated 9.8.2018 shall remain unaltered.

5.

Mr. Aneja, on instructions of Mr. Bindal, the Director of the petitioner company seeks leave to withdraw the captioned petition. 6.

The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

7.

Pending application shall also stand closed.

CRL.M.A. 9738/2018 8.

Mr. Batra, learned senior counsel for the respondent, on instructions says that since the main petition has been withdrawn, he has instructions not to press the captioned application.

9.

The same is, accordingly, dismissed as not pressed. RAJIV SHAKDHER, J OCTOBER 26, 2018 rb ARB.P. 828/2017