Mohit Jhangiani v. Veena Batra

$~5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RFA 6/2018 & CM Nos. 152-154/2018 MOHIT JHANGIANI ..... Appellant Through:

Ms. Rashmi Bansal, Advocate.

versus VEENA BATRA ..... Respondent Through

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J. MEHTA

O R D E R

% 05.01.2018 1.

After arguments, and at the stage of dictation of the judgment for dismissing of the appeal, inasmuch as there is no dispute as to the relationship of landlord and tenant and the suit premises being outside the protection of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, and also by applying the ratio of the judgment of this Court in the case of M/s.Jeevan Diesels and Electricals Limited Vs. Jasbir Singh Chadha (HUF) and Anr. (2011) 183 DLT 712, counsel for the appellant states that the appeal on being disposed of as not pressed the appellant be granted time to vacate the suit premises on or before 30.6.2018.

2.

Accordingly, the appeal is disposed of as not pressed and the

appellant is granted time to vacate the suit premises on or before 30.6.2018 subject to the appellant clearing the entire admitted arrears of rent till date and continuing to pay admitted rate of rent every month, month by month on the 15th of each month till the appellant/defendant continues in possession of the suit premises.

Appellant will also ensure that all charges towards electricity, water etc are cleared in time.

3.

Let the appellant file an affidavit of undertaking in this Court within one week and on the appellant filing the affidavit of undertaking and complying with the terms of the same, appellant will not be evicted from the suit premises till 30.6.2018.

4.

The appeal is accordingly disposed of with the aforesaid observations. VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J JANUARY 05, 2018 ib