← Library
High Court of DelhiCRL.M.C./5332/2017

Sushil Kumar Dhand v. The State Govt Of NCT Of Delhi & ORS

2017-12-18Hon'Ble Mr. Justice A.K. Pathak2 pages

$~44 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CRL.M.C. 5332/2017 & Crl. M.A. No. 20874/2017 SUSHIL KUMAR DHAND ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Puneet Khurana and Mr. Sachit Sethi, Advs. with petitioner in person versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ..... Respondents Through Ms. Manjeet Arya, APP with SI Jeetendra Singh, P.S. Subhash Palace for the respondent no. 1 Respondent nos. 2 to 4 in person

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK

O R D E R

% 18.12.2017 Property disputes between the petitioner and respondent nos. 2 to 4 led to registration of the present FIR No. 313/2003 under Section 420/34 IPC at police station Saraswati Vihar on the complaint of respondent no. 4. After investigation, charge-sheet was filed, wherein offences under Sections 468/471 IPC were also added. During the pendency of the trial, petitioner and respondent nos. 2 to 4 have settled their disputes amicably before the Delhi Mediation Centre, Rohini District Courts, Delhi on 2nd June, 2017. Respondent nos. 2 to 4 are present in Court and have been identified by SI

Jeetendra Singh of police station Subhash Palace. Respondent nos. 2 to 4 admit having settled the matter with petitioner of their own free will, voluntarily and without any undue force, pressure or coercion. Petitioner has paid `4,50,000/- to the respondent no.3 vide a demand draft, photocopy whereof has been placed on record.

Respondent nos. 2 to 4 submit that entire settled amount stands paid with this payment. They further submit that they are not willing to pursue the FIR any further against the petitioner and the same may be quashed.

Keeping in view the settlement arrived at between the petitioner and respondent nos. 2 to 4, in the interest of justice, FIR No. 313/2003 under Sections 420/468/471/34 IPC registered at police station Saraswati Vihar and the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed. Petition is disposed of in the above terms. Miscellaneous application is disposed of as infructuous. Dasti.

A.K. PATHAK, J.

DECEMBER 18, 2017 r.bararia